by Rhetoric on Wed Oct 07, 2009 8:50 pm
When it comes to running game, being congruent with yourself the entire time is always important. You don’t want to be some fascinating guy online and then some boring guy in person. Same thing goes with the websites you run game on. I only use facebook, so the game I run on it has to be somewhat congruent with the site, at least at first. What I mean is this… Facebook is a site for keeping in touch with friends, family, coworkers, etc. It’s not a site for dating and meeting random people – at least not primarily. That’s not even its secondary or tertiary purpose. Having said this, it’s best for me to come across as just some fun social guy who couldn’t care less about a girl’s response or lack there of. On a dating site, you can push the envelope a little more, but you still want to come across as disinterested, and uncaring in terms of her response. Like jack also mentions in his latest video, you don’t want to jump through any hoops and you want to maintain your frame from the start at all times.
I think the biggest draw back to your message about roses is that it not only got a little sappy, slowed things down, and showed a little too much interest, but you also kinda entered her frame a little. Instead of just giving a returning IOI, you made her subject the focus of your message.
Now onto the questions at hand…
When I first used facebook to game girls before I knew about the community, I just kept messages short and treated them like real conversation. They weren’t fancy messages and most of the girls were ones I already met in person, so they already had some interest in me - making it easier on my part. I got pretty quick at responding to them because I would just improvise the whole message as I typed, like in do in most conversations. This is really the best way to get decent at responding to messages. I recommend just trying out a few random messages with girls you don’t care about. Don’t make them fancy; just make them short, challenging, and interesting. Then when and if they do respond back, just read their response and start typing. Once you’ve typed something out, you can go back and read it to make sure it’s somewhat solid prior to sending it.
Prior to starting this thread I hadn’t done any online game in three years which means this is the first time I’ve done any since I’ve gotten involved in this community. The first three messages I posted on here that involve the marriage and wallaby stuff took me about 20 minutes each to finish completely. I took a good while coming up with responses because I tried to include so much PUA spice into every sentence. Then I came up with that rubric/outline and now I can type them out in just a few minutes (about 3 minutes for short ones and about 5-6 for longer ones). Try not to over complicate things. It’s tempting to read a girl’s response and try to decipher every word of it. That’s a dumb idea though, because most girls spend less than 3 minutes responding to your message. You aren’t going to see a girl sit there and try to think of some cleaver, witty message that will keep you guessing. So if something is confusing or questionable, it’s more than likely just a poorly written sentence on her part.
Being able to think on your feet is important in all aspects of life including game and online game. It not only makes things faster and easier for you, but it helps keep you out of your own head space which will make things sound more natural and congruent to who you are. This is why when it comes to real life game, i try to improvise a good 90% of the conversation, only memorizing a few C&F responses and what not. With online game, i try to only reuse qualifying questions and hook points like that dumb wallaby question.
With the outline I showed above, you don’t have to follow every point of it. Also, several sections overlap each other. I’ll post some examples soon that show how I ignore most points on the outline in order to keep things progressing forward and to keep the message short. I have a bad habit of typing A LOT. So it’s best to skip a few points on the outline rather than writing a novel. I have sent some long messages to girls but not until after they have begun to lengthen their messages too. Even so, I keep things progressing and stay in my own frame.
...
You’re right; it does suck to lose a girl using a new method when you know you could have gotten far better results with some of your old methods. I’ve had this happen to me a couple times in real life when I started making my switch from scripted opinion openers to more natural openers. However, now I feel far more comfortable and get better results going more natural than using opinion openers. You have to lose some to win some. You’ll be better off in the end.
...
As far as DHV stories go, I rarely every use those ever. Not even in real life. My value bits are short and simple. For instance I’ll mention a past girlfriend or I’ll say something that demonstrates how I understand women better than the average guy. I may mention an activity in passing that’s attractive. Just remember that the four basic DHV spikes that Mystery outlined are: willingness to emote, leader of men, protector of loved ones, and preselected by women. Also know some basic qualities girls find attractive and if they are congruent to you, you can mention them in passing, but stories are unnecessary. However, if you’re good at making short stories then do so, especially if they are true. If you’re uncertain about a story you’re thinking about sharing, post on these forums somewhere. There are plenty of folks on here who can give solid critiques on it.
Qualifying questions are definitely important though. I’ll post a list either tonight or tomorrow of some of my favorites. I’ll also mention how I lead up to them. That’s important because you don’t want to make it sound scripted and interview style. Even if your question is unique, if you don’t lead up to well, it sounds forced and preplanned. For example, I wouldn't say:
“We should hang out next time I’m in the area. There’s a great place over on the corner that serves some of the best tea you’ll ever taste. You’ve gotta try it. If the world were full of clones of you, what would it be like?”
That would just be stupid. I like that question, but nothing lead up to it. Instead, I’ll put something like:
“Haha. I like your sense of humor, but at the same time it makes me a little upset. I just don’t think the two of us could ever get along. I think we may be too similar. I mean… if the world were full of clones of you, what would it be like?”
I just made both of those up just now using a question I’ve used before, so they aren’t fantastic. However, I think it gets my point across. The second one clearly leads up to the question far more naturally even if it’s not perfect.
More on this later though.
Texas AFC on the path to become a PUA